Intercepting employee communications

post-title

Labour Law Management Consulting's Ivan Israelstam explains the rights of employers regardin the interception of information.

Many employers are still not aware of the Regulation of Interception of Communications Act (RICA) that came into effect at the end of September 2005, or that it was amended in 2008.

 

[chro-cta slug=a-look-at-the-2019-chro-awards]

 

RICA is, in certain places, written in unclear terms. For example, section 6 appears to allow monitoring of employee communications if these communications have been made in the course of the carrying on of the employer’s business. However, there is no clarity as to what “in the course of the employer’s business” means. Does it mean that the subject of the email must be business related or does it mean that the email must have been sent during business hours via the employer’s facilities?

 

However, section 2 of RICA very clearly outlaws the interception of any communication in the course of its transmission.

 

RICA appears to cover telephonic, email and all other communications. The word intercept in section 2 of RICA means the “…acquisition of the contents” of the communication and includes access via “ listening to, viewing, examining or inspecting the communication.

Employers need to be able to monitor employee usage of their communications systems in order to prevent the problems that arise from such misconduct.

The only section of RICA providing any hope for employers is section 5 that gives employers the right to intercept employee communications if one of the parties to the communication gives written consent thereto. This the best way for an employer to protect itself from employees who:

  • Send objectionable material to each other or to parties outside of the workplace;
  • Use up bandwidth that is needed for business purposes;
  • Waste company time and money making private calls, surfing the net or sending private emails;
  • Expose the employer’s computer’s to viruses;
  • Expose the employer to lawsuits; and/or
  • Run their own private businesses via the employer's computers and email systems.

In light of RICA’s rigid provisions, the best strategy that employers can use with any safety is to get written permission from all employees to monitor their email or other communications. Employers should, in addition, draw up clear and comprehensive policies with regards to prohibiting the abuse of communication systems and the employer’s rights to protect their interests.

 

The obtaining of employees’ permission and the design of such policies should be done in consultation with a labour law expert in order to ensure that the employer neither infringes any legislation nor leaves any loopholes in its own system.

Related articles

Why diverse workplaces are a must

Embracing radical openness and generational differences proves to be beneficial for businesses worldwide, writes Anja van Beek, talent strategist, leadership and HR expert, and executive coach.

What is the real cost of sexual harassment in the workplace?

Nelly Mohale, head of human capital at Decusatio, and Ginen Moodley, founder of Moodley Attorneys, explain how sexual harassment in the workplace doesn’t only have financial implications, but also leads to emotional and reputational damage for both the parties and the organisation.

Top