2 avenues for overturning arbitration awards 

post-title

Labour law expert Ivan Israelstam says arbitration rulings can be overturned via a labour court review or rescission application.

The Labour Relations Act (LRA) does not allow any party to appeal against an arbitration award. However, such awards can be overturned via a Labour Court review or via a rescission application made to CCMA.

Labour court review

When taking the Labour Court route, the party who is unhappy with the award asks the labour Court to set the award aside on the grounds that the arbitrator either committed misconduct in relation to his/her arbitration duties; committed a gross irregularity in the conduct of the arbitration proceedings; exceeded his/her powers; or made the award improperly.

Examples of this include:

  • Taking into account evidence that was not put before the arbitrator
  • Refusing to allow valid and relevant evidence to be brought
  • Ignoring statutory requirements or legal principles
  • Unduly assisting one or other party with his/her case
  • Delivering a biased award
  • Taking a bribe
  • Failure to apply his/her mind to the facts in evidence

Rescission application

Alternatively, a rescission application can be made to the CCMA in terms of section 144 of the LRA on the grounds that the award was made in error.  Rescission applications are most commonly brought when one party has not attended the arbitration hearing and the award has been made in that party’s absence. 

Typical rescission applications are granted include when they are made within the 14-day deadline and there is valid proof submitted of illness, or of failure of the CCMA/bargaining council to serve the notice of set down on the party concerned.

However, parties are warned that the CCMA is unlikely to accept excuses for the absence of parties where the employer could have avoided the cause of absence. That is, if it had been within the power of the absent party to have attended the arbitration the chances of a rescission being granted are small. In Shoprite Checkers vs CCMA & others (2005, 8 BLLR 816) the employer failed to attend the arbitration hearing. The arbitrator held the hearing in absentia and granted an award in favour of the employee. The employer then applied for a rescission on the grounds that the assistant of the person in charge of the matter had incorrectly diarised the date of the arbitration. The CCMA turned down the rescission application.

The employer therefore took the matter on review to the Labour Court. The Court upheld the CCMA’s decision saying that a negligent error by the employer is not grounds for rescission. The Court ordered the employer to pay the employee’s legal costs expended on defending the Labour Court review application. Parties are therefore advised to exercise extreme care in keeping records of CCMA hearings, ensure that they attend all CCMA meetings and hearings, and get advice from a reputable labour law expert before applying for rescissions and lodging applications at the Labour Court

Related articles

2026 Executive Day: CEOs, the C-suite is watching the green and red flags

During an attention-grabbing panel discussion at the 2026 Executive Day, Paul Norman, group CHRO at MTN, and Celiwe Ross, group chief human capital and corporate affairs officer at Old Mutual, put the CEO role under the executive microscope, unpacking the green flags, red flags and everything in between that can make or break the C-suite dynamic.

CHRO Webinar: When AI joins the HR team

A recent webinar, hosted in partnership with Factorial, brought together Neridha Moodley, people and culture lead at SNG Grant Thornton; Zameer Ahmed, head of HR digital transformation at Netcare; and Paolo Urzi, partnership development manager at Factorial, to unpack what responsible AI adoption looks like in practice, and how HR leaders can harness technology without losing sight of the people at the heart of the function.

CHROs reflect on the workplace women truly deserve

What does the workplace women deserve look like? This Women’s Day, we put that question to HR leaders Elanie Kruger, CHRO at Tsebo Solutions Group; Shehnaaz Kajee, head of HR at HBZ Bank; and Sinqobile Khuluse, CPO at Sandock Austral Shipyards, who have a front-row seat to shaping the employee experience.

Embracing the strengths of neurodiversity in the workplace

The term neurodiversity is becoming ubiquitous in a world where the diversity in peoples’ cognitive abilities is being highlighted in the mainstream. Current estimates show that as many as 15 percent to 20 percent of the global population is neurodivergent, meaning that one in five employees falls into this category.

Top